Ok, I have long suspected that ErlyWeb is faster than Ruby on Rails, even on a single server. But I wanted proof. Now I have proof; well, at least clear indications: http://blog.davber.com/2007/12/10/web-server-performance-shoot-out-simple-pages/
Interesting to note is that ErlyWeb (just like the Haskell cousin, HAppS) is FASTER with dynamic content than with static content (from file...) :-) >From a non-performance aspect, it is interesting to note the difference in meta programming between ErlyWeb - with its reflective Smerl - and that of HAppS/Haskell with compilation-based code generation; ok, HAppS is not using Haskell proper (i.e., 98) but instead Template Haskell, which gives ALMOST as much flexibility as reflection/introspection. Ok, see you soon! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlyweb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlyweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
