Oops, turned out I set up Mongrail wrong and it looks like the difference is only 6x (or lower)
Yariv On Dec 9, 2007 11:43 PM, Yariv Sadan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You have funny timing -- I spent most of the weekend running real > benchmarks between two EC2 instances and I found that ErlyWeb > obliterates Rails in performance, with a peak response rate that's 47x > higher than Rails (it may be even higher, because it looks like > ErlyWeb saturated EC2's internal bandwidth). > > http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2007/12/09/erlyweb-vs-ruby-on-rails-ec2-performance-showdown > > Try to do hot code swapping in Haskell :) > > Cheers, > Yariv > > > > On Dec 9, 2007 9:30 PM, davber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ok, I have long suspected that ErlyWeb is faster than Ruby on Rails, > > even on a single server. But I wanted proof. Now I have proof; well, > > at least clear indications: > > http://blog.davber.com/2007/12/10/web-server-performance-shoot-out-simple-pages/ > > > > Interesting to note is that ErlyWeb (just like the Haskell cousin, > > HAppS) is FASTER with dynamic content than with static content (from > > file...) :-) > > > > From a non-performance aspect, it is interesting to note the > > difference in meta programming between ErlyWeb - with its reflective > > Smerl - and that of HAppS/Haskell with compilation-based code > > generation; ok, HAppS is not using Haskell proper (i.e., 98) but > > instead Template Haskell, which gives ALMOST as much flexibility as > > reflection/introspection. > > > > Ok, see you soon! > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlyweb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlyweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
