Jim Richardson wrote:
> The report said someone pulled the bolts, but failed to document it, and
> the procedure for rotation wasn't followed (checking said bolts) Sounds
> like either a process failure, or a failure to follow the process.
Or both. Sounds like the "well they're not using these" met the "It's
always worked before" schools of process control.
And why, for a vehicle that won't be launched for 5 years, were they
using pressurized tanks??
Michael
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Wallis KF6SPF (408) 396-9037 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"It is not only what we do, but also what we do not do, for which we
are accountable." - Moliere
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
