> Since generators are shallow, it seems clear that there > should be some local cps-style transform of generators into the > remainder of the language. However, it would be a relief to know what > that cps-style transform actually looks like, and what edge cases it > has. Anyone care to post a proposal?
Can't be done without defining the entire language in CPS. Yes, it's shallow, but a captured activation can involve any arbitrary combination of expressions other than function call. Dave _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list Es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss