Felix wrote:
> Ingvar von Schoultz wrote:
>> ...(but restricted to returned values). Also, my brain wants to
>> allow the following, or at least reserve as a future possibility...
>>
>> var {a: x, b: y+z} = fn();
>
> your form confuses me a lot, because it's not clear to me where 'y' and
> 'z' are coming from. what if the thing returned by fn() doesn't have a
> 'y', is it going to pull 'y' from the lexical scope, or is it going to
> use 'undefined' for 'y'?
That's what I meant by "restricted to returned values": I would
expect that the lexical scope would not be visible.
> the es-harmony form
> var {x: a, y: b} = fn();
> makes intuitive sense to me because the thing on the left is a
> pattern-matching template. I'm saying that I expect the rhs object to
> have that shape, and if the shape does match, pull out values from it.
Thanks for the description, it helps.
Is this the actual semantics? Does it require a matching shape
and throw an error otherwise?
--
Ingvar von Schoultz
_______________________________________________
Es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
