On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Brendan Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 24, 2008, at 6:51 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Brendan Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> Why is eq being proposed whatever happens with Decimal? >> >> Because in the absence of decimal, === is close enough to an >> "identical" test that one can practically code around the problem >> cases (NaN and -0) > > You're assuming 1.0m === 1.00m must be true. I'm disputing that (see > exchange with Sam, who may agree).
I agree that you are disputing that. ;-P Less than 10 hours ago, ISTR you were suggesting the opposite. "there's a weak case for false"... On Thursday, ISTR Mark arguing that "correspond to the same point on the real number line" was close enough to an "identical" test. I think I need to sit down now, I'm getting dizzy. :-) - Sam Ruby _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list Es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
