On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Mark S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Brendan Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yes, this is gross. I'm in favor of Object.identical and Object.hashcode, > > I don't care if Object.eq is named Object.identical. Other than > spelling, does your Object.identical differ from Object.eq? If not, > then I think we're in agreement. > >> maybe even in ES3.1 (I should get my act together and help spec 'em). Just >> not particularly on account of Decimal, even with equated cohort members. I >> still agree with Sam. And as always,"hard cases make bad law". > > What is it you and Sam are agreeing about? I lost track. > > I like the point about bad law. Numerics are definitely a hard case.
Give me a day or so, and I'll post a typo-free transcript based on running code, and people can identify specific results that they take issue with, and/or more expressions that they would like to see in the results. - Sam Ruby _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list Es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
