Waldemar Horwat wrote:
Here are my views on this.
2) Do we want to permit conforming implementations to extend the JSON
grammar that they recognize? This probably could be done by extending
the syntax error extension allowance in section 16 to include the JSON
grammar. If we allow this then most of the observed variation for the
current emerging implementation that we have been talking about would
probably be acceptable extensions.
JSON is done. JSON will not be revised. Someday it might be replaced and
that replacement will have a different name and likely a different model.
Chapter 16 should not give a license to fiddle with the JSON grammar.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
