Douglas Crockford wrote:
Waldemar Horwat wrote:
2) Do we want to permit conforming implementations to extend the JSON
grammar that they recognize? This probably could be done by
extending the syntax error extension allowance in section 16 to
include the JSON grammar. If we allow this then most of the observed
variation for the current emerging implementation that we have been
talking about would probably be acceptable extensions.
JSON is done. JSON will not be revised. Someday it might be replaced and
that replacement will have a different name and likely a different model.
Chapter 16 should not give a license to fiddle with the JSON grammar.
OK, so we need not discuss any new numeric types any further in committee
because it would be impossible to round-trip them through JSON. Do we have
agreement on that?
Waldemar
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
