I like it. I might prefer "module loader" for a bit more concreteness. But it has the benefit of concreteness and familiarity.
Dave On Feb 3, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:11 PM, David Herman <dher...@mozilla.com> wrote: > > Well, a "module system" is a language construct that provides modules. I > > think "sandbox" sort of suggests more isolation than is necessarily > > provided. PLT Scheme uses the worst possible name for the concept (I won't > > even say what it is, it's so awful). > > > > I'll think about alternatives and update the wiki. > > How about "module group"? > > Since, AFAICT, the concept being named here, in Java, corresponds to a > ClassLoader, I suggest "loader". (E calls these "loaders" as well.) > > > > Dave > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > > -- > Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain > > Cheers, > --MarkM >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
