On Feb 3, 2010, at 4:07 PM, David Herman wrote:
I like it. I might prefer "module loader" for a bit more
concreteness. But it has the benefit of concreteness and familiarity.
+1 on module loader, loader for short. Thanks, Mark!
/be
Dave
On Feb 3, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:11 PM, David Herman <dher...@mozilla.com>
wrote:
> Well, a "module system" is a language construct that provides
modules. I think "sandbox" sort of suggests more isolation than is
necessarily provided. PLT Scheme uses the worst possible name for
the concept (I won't even say what it is, it's so awful).
>
> I'll think about alternatives and update the wiki.
How about "module group"?
Since, AFAICT, the concept being named here, in Java, corresponds
to a ClassLoader, I suggest "loader". (E calls these "loaders" as
well.)
Dave
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
--
Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain
Cheers,
--MarkM
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
