On Feb 25, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:

> On 2/25/11 4:08 PM, David Bruant wrote:
>> I would tend to be more in favor of disallowing Harmony features in
>> non-strict code (without explicit "use strict" directive) to avoid
>> surprises (I'm nuancing below).
> 
> I was under the impression that Harmony features would only be allowed for 
> scripts that opt in to them (via the type or language of the <script> tag or 
> whatnot).  Does that alleviate this concern?

Yes, Harmony requires opt-in versioning, at least via <script 
type="application/ecmascript;version=6"> (for example). An in-language "use 
version 6" pragma has been discussed too, for fail-fast when code gets copied 
and pasted into the wrong container.

However, some cats are (at least partly) out of the bag in Firefox: let, const, 
yield. Both let and yield require different opt-in already 
(type="application/javascript;version=1.7").

Our let and const (especially) implementations are not Harmonious, and we still 
need to pin down precise semantics for Harmony, but they are close enough -- 
see Waldemar's post: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/es-discuss@mozilla.org/msg05017.html -- and 
generally used correctly (in future-proof ways) by their fans.

We at Mozilla will bear the cost of shifting (mostly Firefox add-on) JS hackers 
over across any changes that do break let-, const-, and yield-using code. IOW, 
we renounce any potential de-facto standard in our let and const prototype 
implementations. We will break ourselves, and first, so that other implemntors 
don't have to reverse-engineer our prototypes (not that this is a credible 
problem: cross-browser JS code cannot use 'let' at all, and 'const' is not 
consistently implemented either).

The function-in-block semantics in Firefox are un-Harmonious enough that we ban 
those in Firefox 4's strict mode implementation.

Anyone writing cross-browser code will want to opt into Harmony, to shield 
downrev browsers from syntax errors.

/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to