Hi Axel, I'm glad you're asking the right question. To clarify for everyone, "EcmaScript-Harmony" (or just "Harmony") names our agreed trajectory for the language following ES5. We understand that the goals of this trajectory will take several new editions to realize. "ES-next" is our working name for the next edition along this trajectory, likely to be named "ES6".
So, not having need proposed or sanctioned prior to the May meeting cutoff date, I'd say the chances of this making ii into ES-next are vanishingly small. However, it is consistent with the overall goals for Harmony, so yes. Just because it's not a candidate for ES-next is no reason to postponing discussing it on es-discuss of course. I would very much like to see something along these lines become standard in some later edition. On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Axel Rauschmayer <a...@rauschma.de> wrote: > http://blog.mozilla.com/dherman/2011/06/28/the-js-parser-api-has-landed/ > > I’ve just read D. Herman’s post on Firefox’s parser API. Is there any > chance that this kind of API will make it into Harmony? It would be really > useful for a variety of generative/meta-programming tasks. > > Axel > > -- > Dr. Axel Rauschmayer > > a...@rauschma.de > twitter.com/rauschma > > home: rauschma.de > blog: 2ality.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
