Maybe we could start with an “official” separate JavaScript-only implementation?
On Jun 29, 2011, at 1:05 , Mark S. Miller wrote: > Hi Axel, I'm glad you're asking the right question. To clarify for everyone, > "EcmaScript-Harmony" (or just "Harmony") names our agreed trajectory for the > language following ES5. We understand that the goals of this trajectory will > take several new editions to realize. "ES-next" is our working name for the > next edition along this trajectory, likely to be named "ES6". > > So, not having need proposed or sanctioned prior to the May meeting cutoff > date, I'd say the chances of this making ii into ES-next are vanishingly > small. However, it is consistent with the overall goals for Harmony, so yes. > Just because it's not a candidate for ES-next is no reason to postponing > discussing it on es-discuss of course. I would very much like to see > something along these lines become standard in some later edition. > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Axel Rauschmayer <a...@rauschma.de> wrote: > http://blog.mozilla.com/dherman/2011/06/28/the-js-parser-api-has-landed/ > > I’ve just read D. Herman’s post on Firefox’s parser API. Is there any chance > that this kind of API will make it into Harmony? It would be really useful > for a variety of generative/meta-programming tasks. > > Axel > > -- > Dr. Axel Rauschmayer > > a...@rauschma.de > twitter.com/rauschma > > home: rauschma.de > blog: 2ality.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > > -- > Cheers, > --MarkM -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de twitter.com/rauschma home: rauschma.de blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
