On Oct 10, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Bob Nystrom wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Dean Landolt <d...@deanlandolt.com> wrote:
>
> Here's an example:
>
> let tree = [['a', 'b', 'c'], [['d', 'e'], 'f'], ['g']];
>
> let inOrder = walk(tree);
> for (node of walk(tree)) alert(node); // a, b, c, d, ...
>
> walk(tree) {
> if (typeof tree == 'string') {
> yield tree; // leaf
> } else {
> yield* walk(tree); // branch
> }
> }
>
> What would the above look like without generators?
>
>
> Woah there -- where does this syntax come from? Was `walk(tree) {...}`
> supposed to be `function* walk(tree) {...}` instead? Or is this intended to
> represent some sort of method generator? If the latter, doesn't this need
> some mechanism to distinguish it from a non-generator method?
>
> Whoops, my mistake. Too much time working on the class proposal where
> "function" isn't needed for methods.
I spy a Dart ;-).
> Yes, that should be function*.
Still a great delegated generator example. Thanks,
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
