On Nov 1, 2011, at 5:18 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: > On Oct 31, 2011, at 6:57 PM, Jeremy Ashkenas wrote: > >> 'Evening, ES-Discuss. >> >> After poking a stick in the bees' nest this morning (apologies, Allen), and >> in the spirit of loyal opposition, it's only fair that I throw my hat in the >> ring. >> >> Here is a proposal for minimalist JavaScript classes that enable behavior >> that JavaScripters today desire (as evidenced by libraries and languages >> galore), without adding any new semantics beyond what already exists in ES3. >> >> https://gist.github.com/1329619 >> >> Let me know what you think, and feel free to fork. > > Thanks, I did fork, and I made a Rich Corinthian Leather version, for the > reasons given in the comments. In brief, I contend that over-minimizing will > please no one: class haters still gonna hate, while class lovers used to > batteries-and-leather-included will find the bare sheet metal poky and > painful. > > Love it or hate it, I'm ok either way :-P. But I do crave intelligent > responses.
Handy link included: https://gist.github.com/1332193 /be
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
