On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:17 AM, Jason Orendorff wrote: > I'm with Allen. If ES classes can contain any initialization code, I > think it should run in program order, interleaved with top-level > statements. Anything else is just confusing.
This is a great point, which I'd overlooked (not sure if Allen already said that and I missed it). But I'm not sure whether it argues for no declarative classes, for no syntax for statics, or for a restricted syntax for statics (e.g., only static methods). > Note that classdefs in Ruby and Python aren't hoisted, and nobody > complains. In those languages classdefs very often contain procedural > code, for many purposes. Good comparison, thanks. More grist... Dave _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
