On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Andrea Giammarchi < andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As long as we don't end up with ambiguous constructor as Array could be ( > Array(1) VS Array([1]) ) ... so what if the iterable *is* the value I would > like to add() automatically ? Don't use spread on it. > If it's about auto magic population with auto magic filtering and ordering > of potential duplicated values ( and already too much magic, imo ) I would > keep Set.length 0 accepting 0 to N arguments rather than a single one so > yes, spread through iterable would be ideal. > > On the other hand, Map and WeakMap have different relation, based on > pairs, and different kind of pairs ( object only or anything ) > > What if we leave these constructors in peace and let outer wrappers > eventually decide what kind of sorcery should be applied during > initialization ? :-) > I think that's the intent of allowing spread to exhaust an iterator.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
