nope, Set does not even accept arguments as it is now ... does it ? On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Dean Landolt <d...@deanlandolt.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < > andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> if you accept a single argument, of course, but what if you Set(..[1, 2, >> 1]) then ? > > > `Set(1, 2, 1)` then? Are you suggesting this should throw? So you'd need > to dedupe your arguments before you construct a set with them? Isn't that a > primary use case of sets? > > >> >> magic add through Set constructor does not sound good to me >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Peter Michaux <petermich...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Andrea Giammarchi >>> <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > thinking about the add behavior, where no duplicated values will be >>> added, >>> > this argument may cause some logic headache anyway >>> > >>> > Set([1, 2, 1]) what should happen ? >>> >>> I think that should be a set with one element. The element is an array >>> of length three. >>> >>> Peter >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> es-discuss@mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >> >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
