that or "prototypeof"? On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:57 PM, felix <feli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> A friend commented, all the symbol forms are difficult to speak over a >> phone. The operator will need a common pronounceable name, so why not use >> that instead of a symbol. > > > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:proto_operator > > The very first paragraph addresses this: "prototype for" > > >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.r...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Allen, >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock < >>> al...@wirfs-brock.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Mar 3, 2012, at 11:17 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: >>>> >>>> Dean Landolt wrote: >>>> >>>> Does it /have/ to be ascii? >>>> >>>> >>>> Does it have to be grawlix? I proposed >>>> >>>> let sub = sup beget {p:1, q:2, r:3}; >>>> >>>> a while back, and we discussed alternative contextual keywords. Grawlix >>>> appears to result in (a) strong anti-grawlix reaction from a good part of >>>> the community; (b) no consensus on which cuss-characters to use. >>>> >>>> >>>> I have two significant sized code samples that differ only in the use >>>> of "beget" in place of <| >>>> >>>> Compare: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://github.com/allenwb/ESnext-experiments/blob/master/ST80collections-exp1.js >>>> >>>> >>>> and >>>> >>>> >>>> https://github.com/allenwb/ESnext-experiments/blob/master/ST80collections-exp6.js >>>> >>>> >>> >>> These are extremely helpful - thank you for sharing. It's very clear to >>> me that a symbol/operator is the obvious choice when faced with a large >>> code example - "beget" just gets lost, where <| is very noticeable and very >>> obvious (and even helped me to better understand the outcome of using the >>> operator) >>> >>> Unfortunately, the examples do nothing to make me like this particular >>> choice... but I do love seeing this language feature come to life :) >>> >>> >>> Rick >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Allen >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> es-discuss mailing list >>>> es-discuss@mozilla.org >>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> es-discuss@mozilla.org >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
