with corrected link to wiki page: 
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:proto_operator#suggestion_to_replace_with
 

On Mar 2, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:

It was recently suggested to me that it is unlikely that we will ever adopt -> 
as as function expression shorthand symbol and that this means we could 
consider using that symbol sequence for other purposes.  In particular, it 
would be a reasonable and possibly less controversial alternative to the <| 
symbol.  I would have no objection to that switch and have written the 
suggestion up at 
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:proto_operator#suggestion_to_replace_with
  

Some examples of this usage of -> include: 

  MyObject.prototype -> {a:1,b:2}
  appArrayBehavior->[0,1,2,3,4,5]
  let subclass = superclass -> function () {};
  var p = newRegExpMethods -> /[a-m][3-7]/

What do you think? Do you like -> better than <| ?  Is it ok to not have it 
available for some possible future function shorthand?

Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to