On Mar 31, 2012, at 5:19 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
> As a quick follow-up:
>
> Perhaps adding non-arcane-incantation private name declarations would be
> enough to push maximally-minimal classes from “nice, but are they worth it?”
> to “this gives us something we can’t get anywhere else.” To wit:
>
> class Set extends Collection {
> private setContents, setTally
>
> constructor(initialSize = 2) {
> this.{
> @setContents: new Array(initialSize),
> @setTally: 0
> }
> }
>
> // ...
> }
>
Using a private declaration to define privateName bindings is still on the
table. I just didn't show it in these example. However, it would most likely
go outside of the class declarations:
private setContents, setTally;
class Set extends Collection {
constructor(initialSize = 2) {
this.{
@setContents: new Array(initialSize),
@setTally: 0
}
}
// ...
}
Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
