> JS was not allowed to be "Scheme in the browser". There will be 42 Scheme->JS transpilers by the end of 2012.
;-) > No problem, you say, we can leave typeof alone and add a callable predicate > and evangelize that. Ok, provided the callable protocol uses an ES6 private > name (think gensym), any public name could be in use and make a false > positive when testing callability. Most of what you describe is a consequence of backwards compatibility and maximum dynamicity. ClojureScript gets a pass on these problems (for the most part) because of its focus for use and compilation model. Agreed adding these capabilities into JS is a sticky situation and not something that I envy. I'm glad smarter people than me are working on it. _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
