I think this is a better argument for introducing a new primitive for referencing the current function than for resurrecting arguments.
On Mar 16, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Axel Rauschmayer <a...@rauschma.de> wrote: > Quoting Brendan Eich in [1]: > >> arrows can't have intrinsic names (contrast with NFEs) so arguments.callee >> may be wanted, so arrows should not be strict-only. > > Is this really an option? Sounds messy. Like a carrot to go back to > non-strict. I’d either allow arguments.callee in both modes. Or introduce a > new mechanism for a function to refer to itself. I thought that `arguments` > would disappear from JavaScript code over time so the latter alternative > seems better. > > Axel > > [1] https://github.com/rwldrn/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2013-01/jan-30.md > > -- > Dr. Axel Rauschmayer > a...@rauschma.de > > home: rauschma.de > twitter: twitter.com/rauschma > blog: 2ality.com > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
