This is probably the most humor I've ever seen on esdiscuss.
On Mar 17, 2013, at 6:33 AM, "Mark S. Miller" <erig...@google.com> wrote:
> Just in case anyone does not realize that this thread is humorous,
>
> const factorial = n => n>1 ? n*factorial(n-1) : 1;
>
> Yes, you can't use this as an expression. So what? After this declaration you
> can use factorial as an expression. Anonymous lambda expressions are a
> wonderful things. But in actual development, I have never yet encountered a
> recursive function I didn't want to name.
>
> Ok, and now back to our irregularly scheduled humor...
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Kevin Smith <khs4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Sorry arrow functions but this isn't a better JS.
>>
>> Bah. Arrow functions are a huge usability win for JS. Try them- you'll see!
>>
>> { Kevin }
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> --MarkM
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
