then is more Ha, ha, ha. Lulz, I told you, lulz! this one?
'__proto__' in {__proto__:null,"__proto__":null}
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Jeff Walden <jwalden...@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 04/21/2013 03:27 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
> > Warning: The following is a sickening idea. I would really hate to see
> us do it. But I feel obliged to post it as it may in fact be the right
> thing to do.
> >
> > This suggests that, in JS as well, the "__proto__" in {....,
> "__proto__": ...., ....} not be treated as a special case. Quoting it turns
> off the special treatment.
>
> For the lulz, what do these print in engines?
>
> print(eval('[{"__proto__": 17}]')[0].hasOwnProperty("__proto__"));
> print(eval('[{"__proto__":0x17}]')[0].hasOwnProperty("__proto__"));
>
> And considering what motivated real-world engine behaviors here, what
> constraints might possibly SunSpider imply? (Conceivably none, to be sure,
> although I have my doubts a strstr could be eaten here. Or maybe just
> another mode for the parser. Ha, ha, ha. Lulz, I told you, lulz!)
>
> Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
