Hi David, I am Mark and speak only for my fraction of TC39 ;). But I am happy with your summary. Thanks.
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:47 AM, David Bruant <bruan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le 07/05/2013 18:30, Andrea Giammarchi a écrit : > > You did not answer my question Mark: what is the role of TC39, embrace >> "whatever non-standard crossbrowser thing" or filter ideas proposing better >> alternatives/solutions when necessary in order to have a solid foundation >> instead of having Object.defineProperty({get}) AND __defineGetter__ from >> the past? >> >> This is a concern of mine, and I'd like to hear a clear statement about >> this, thanks. >> > I'm not Mark and not part of TC39, but I'll give it a try. > I believe TC39 position is in between your 2 propositions. Aiming at > improving on a solid basis while still codefying de facto standards when > necessary (that is when it's in some implementations and other implementors > are pushed by content to implement it). > > I don't get why you're being so hard on TC39. The WHATWG has been doing > *exactly* that for years now; looking at what several browsers implement > and is used in content and codifying it. Beyond the hype, large parts of > HTML5 are de facto standards. > > David > > ______________________________**_________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/es-discuss<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> > -- Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss