On 9 May 2013 14:58, Gareth Smith <g...@doc.ic.ac.uk> wrote: > In general, I think the message I'm getting from you is that when it > comes to for-in, a more permissive reading of the standard is likely to > be more accurate. > > Does this seem fair?
Yes, I would say so. Moreover, I wouldn't even assume that for-in semantics is deterministic for any given VM -- it can change depending on dynamic optimisations and representation changes. /Andreas _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
