On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Karolis Narkevičius <karoli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why can't we have both with the same syntax? > > ```js > // imports a function which is the default export > import mkdirp from "mkdirp"; > ``` > > and > > ```js > // imports all named exports, like module used to > import fs from "fs"; > ``` > According to the spec [1] (IIUC) you can import both all/some of the named export values and the default export value, due to the second option of the ImportClause: ``` ImportClause : ImportedBinding ImportedBinding , NamedImports NamedImports ``` Does this mean that a module can export both a default value and several named values? If so, libraries like Underscore would need to use both namedExport and defaultExport to suite all users. Or would the default value be an object containing all the named export values? If so, it seems like your suggestion is already in the spec. [1]: https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-imports
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
