The place where the current syntax shines is when dealing with anonymous values, On Jun 25, 2014 1:29 AM, "Barronville, Jonathan" <jonat...@belairlabs.com> wrote:
> Kevin, you're not alone :) . I like that last form, too. > > - Jonathan > — > Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox> > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Axel Rauschmayer <a...@rauschma.de> > wrote: > >> I do like the conciseness of the last form. The other forms do indeed not >> seem very useful. >> >> On Jun 25, 2014, at 5:45 , Kevin Smith <zenpars...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> ExportDeclaration: >>> ... >>> export default ClassDeclaration >>> export default FunctionDeclaration >>> export default GeneratorDeclaration >>> export default = AssignmentExpression >>> >>> >> To reply to myself (since no one else appears to be interested), I think >> it might even be best to drop these special forms altogether. The >> non-sugared form of: >> >> export { someVar as default }; >> >> is already very concise, and will help developers understand what this >> whole "default" thing is about. The sugar appears to be obfuscating the >> design, and is doing more harm than good. >> >> Again, thoughts? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> es-discuss@mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Axel Rauschmayer >> a...@rauschma.de >> rauschma.de >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
