Le 27 juin 2014 à 15:56, Claude Pache<claude.pa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
Here is a counter-proposal (or an improved
proposal, ad libidum), which is not tightly coupled to @@new.
This proposal seems ok to me from my DOM-centric perspective. ;)
Optional: the @@create hook
----------------------------
A @@create hook can easily be placed as follows:
In each [[Call]] internal methods defined above, a call to
(`thisArgument`.[[Constructor]]).@@create
could replace the steps spanning from
GetPrototypeFromConstructor(...) inclusive to
InitializeThisBindings(...) exclusive.
Whether such a hook is compatible with, e.g., DOM constructors, is
left to the appreciation of the competent people. At worst, a
built-in constructor could cheat by defining its own [[Call]]
internal method that would refuse to run the @@create hook.
The problem with @@create is not so much whether built-in constructors
call it. It's whether user code can invoke built-in @@create hooks and
hence observe partially-constructed object.
However, with this proposal it seems easy enough to just not provide any
such built-in @@create hooks, right?
-Boris
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
