On Sunday, August 17, 2014, John Barton <johnjbar...@google.com> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Brendan Eich <bren...@mozilla.org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bren...@mozilla.org');>> wrote: > >> John Barton wrote: >> >> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Brendan Eich <bren...@mozilla.org >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bren...@mozilla.org');> <mailto: >>> bren...@mozilla.org >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bren...@mozilla.org');>>> wrote: >>> >>> Yes -- inline scripts, like document.write, the drive-in, disco, >>> and Fortran, will never die. >>> >>> >>> More things I don't suggest investing effort in. >>> >> >> Seriously, inline scripts were and are important, both for avoiding extra >> requests (even with HTTP++ these cost) and, more important, for easiest and >> smoothest beginner/first-script on ramp. >> >> I have no idea why anyone would seriously contend otherwise. Latency >> still matters; tools didn't replace hand-authoring. These are not >> subjective matters. > > > I agree, but the forces behind CSP control the servers. You'll have to > convince them. > Forgive me, but I don't follow this—could you elaborate? It would be appreciated. Rick > > >> >> >> /be >> > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
