On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, John Barton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The reverse case, where a img depends on a script, is not a use
> > > > case.
> > >
> > > Why not? What if the image has an onmouseover handler that calls an
> > > API function defined in a module, for instance?
> >
> > Then the page depends on the onmouseover handler code and it has a
> > dependency on the module. Images are leaf nodes in the dependency tree.
>
> Can you show me the markup for how you would like this to work? I'm not
> sure I follow what your vision is here.
>
<script>
System.import('jquery').then(() => {
$(document).ready(() => {
$("img.a").hover(() => {
$(this).stop().animate({"opacity": "0"}, "slow");
}, () => {
$(this).stop().animate({"opacity": "1"}, "slow");
});
});
});
</script>
Here the page depends upon a mouseover handler which depends upon jquery.
The handler and the page depend upon the image.
>
> ...
> >
> > If you don't want multiple round trips, import from a "bundle".
>
> That doesn't work; see the discussion in this e-mail:
> https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2014-August/038853.html
So I answered on another thread.
jjb
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
