On Aug 21, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
>
> On Aug 21, 2014, at 9:54 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
>
>> Andy Wingo wrote:
>>> On Wed 20 Aug 2014 19:55, Brendan Eich<bren...@mozilla.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> > Kevin Smith wrote:
>>>>> >> function *echo() input {
>>>>> >> while (true) yield input.value;
>>>>> >> }
>>>> >
>>>> > So input is bound to the next() actual parameter value on each
>>>> > resumption. That's not bad shed-coloring!
>>>> >
>>>> > Andy, Dave: WDYT?
>>>
>>> I think changing things right now is the wrong thing to do. Since this
>>> is a compatible extension, we don't have to think about this for ES6.
>>> Just putting that out there;)
>>
>> Oh definitely -- es-discuss and twitter folks need to assume ES6 is done.
>> Train model starting, annual editions if we do it right. Any compatible
>> extension can catch next year's train. This means implementation at the
>> agreed upon stage 2, usually much sooner than next year. See
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QbEE0BsO4lvl7NFTn5WXWeiEIBfaVUF7Dk0hpPpPDzU/edit
>>
>> (Allen: is this the canonical location?)
>
>
> See https://github.com/tc39/ecma262
>
> the plan is to setup separate sub-repos for proposals starting at stage .
> They will have their own issue trackers, etc.
oops, that should be "stage 1" in the sentence above.
Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
