>> * Do these grammar rules mean that you have to put anonymous function
>> expressions in parentheses? Is that desirable (given that it’s a frequent
>> use case)?
>
> No, HoistableDeclaration[Default] includes FunctionDeclaration that lacks a
> BindingIdentifier.
OK, I take it the following wasn’t viable?
> `export default` [lookahead ≠ `function (` ] HoistableDeclaration
> `export default` AssignmentExpression `;`
>> * If the purpose of the first rule is to enable default-exporting of
>> declarations (= no semicolon) – shouldn’t classes be included?
>
> It has nothing to do with semicolons. It's so a function that is a default
> export can also have a local name binding.
Ah, interesting and useful.
> We should also allow:
> export default class Foo {};
>
> where Foo is a module local binding.
Without the semicolon, though? The “operand” of `export default` is also a
declaration, right?
> Please file a bug.
Will do, once I fully understand the issue.
--
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
a...@rauschma.de
rauschma.de
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
