ECMA-357 (E4X) pioneered informative-first prose sections, not found in
ECMA-262 Ed. 3, and as a direct consequence, had too many imprecise or
even inaccurate informative notes, which (turns out) were misread as
normative, or simply otherwise caused confusion.
Thanks for looking into fixing this.
/be
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
Well, that's just an informative note and not normative language.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
