On Monday, June 1, 2015, Tom Van Cutsem <tomvc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2015-06-01 8:38 GMT+02:00 Domenic Denicola <d...@domenic.me > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','d...@domenic.me');>>: > >> From: es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org');>] On >> Behalf Of Gray Zhang >> >> > I’m just wondering is there any reason that Reflect API is not suitable >> to provide such functionality? >> >> Reflect currently contains only methods which correspond to proxy traps. >> There has been talk of extending it beyond that, but making that first step >> is going to be a hurdle for whoever’s proposing it to extend it. > > > Or since Proxy traps correspond 1-to-1 to the "internal methods" in the > spec, the primary goal of the Reflect API was to expose the essential > methods that make up Javascript's object model as defined by the spec. >
I like this definition. Is it written down? (I need ammunition for Reflect.type(x)!)
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
