That might work, although these two might need edited for consistency: - Math.pow === Op.pow (assuming `**` gets in) - Op.num should be similar to `x => +x`, not `x => ToNumber(x)`. The behavior is slightly different, but can be observable without modifying `Number`, I believe.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015, 14:43 Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Isiah Meadows <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I like the idea, but could the function names be made a little > > shorter? I'd like to at least save some characters on it. Example: > > `(a, b) => a > b` is 15 characters, where `Math.greaterThan` is 16. > > > > For comparison, I also have equivalent versions for the colon-preceded > operators > > > > Here's some naming ideas I have: > [snip] > > At that point, though, the use of the Math namespace starts getting > weird. Equality and Logical aren't mathematical; Bitwise mostly isn't > either. (It can sometimes be used to do mathy things, like using > shift to mul/div by a power of 2, but that's not its core purpose.) > > Put them on a new Op namespace object, or into an Op built-in module. > Even shorter, and clearer! > > ~TJ >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
