Regarding Norbert Korodi sentence: "I just wanted You guys to know that nowadays js / es is not really in a good shape. We use it because we have to, not because we like it , so deep down we wish for a more standard language."
Well... this topic could rise a flame war about programming languages, and maybe, it should be closed here. I'm not sure who are the "we" in the above sentence. But I'm one of the happy members of "we" in the sentence: We are using JavaScript, with pleasure, as a powerful and flexible language After coding with IBM mainframe assembly language, BCPL, Algol/W, RPG II, Fortran IV, COBOL in various flavors, PL/I, Prolog, Lisp, Ruby, Python, Forth, APL, Perl, PHP, classic ASP, Quick Basic, Turbo Pascal, DBase II, Clipper, Access, Visual Basic classic, Java, C#/VB/CLR, Clojure, Erlang, Elixir, I could declare JavaScript is one of the most powerful language I know, and a "classical" one in syntax and semantic. Sure, there is no silver bullet... But for many contexts, I prefer JavaScript, as is, it is in a really good shape. Angel "Java" Lopez @ajlopez
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
