Having been a delegate to tc39 from the JS foundation for only about six months, I can't claim authority to speak to all of the history here. That said, I can very assuredly tell you there is a significant amount of respect for every technology that has been mentioned in this thread from most of the committee. In general, the committee sees any tool with significant adoption as an opportunity to learn/draw ideas from, not a plague.
Certainly, all delegates have their own opinions on various things. That said, IMO you wouldn't see any interest in policing libraries and frameworks from the committee. This is in conflict with the extensible web manifesto that most of the committee holds quite dear. On Jul 22, 2017 8:22 AM, "Mike Samuel" <mikesam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 22, 2017 11:14 AM, "Andrea Giammarchi" <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > About frameworks or Angular, version 1 was based on eval and I think > frameworks should have an OK from TC39 before being considered influential . > > > What problems would this address? I would prefer almost any other > solution to taking "official" positions on frameworks or libraries. > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
