On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:47 PM Ranando King <king...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the links T.J.
Not me, it was 森建. I just supplied the corrected broken link from the slides. > ...though I'm a bit confused as to why they'd want to do `@dec export`. > That makes it look like the `export` directive is the target of the > decorator. Weird. On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 4:00 PM Andrea Giammarchi <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > FWIW I agree @dec export is a huge nonsense... I agree with both of you. If the decorator decorates the class, it should be after `export`, not before. I'm sorry if that means that there is a bunch of code written with earlier Stage 1- and Stage 2- versions of decorators that did it the other way, but that's not nearly a good enough reason (IMHO) to do something so clearly non-intuitive and that breaks parallel construction. RIght now, you say "If you want to export X, you put `export` in front of it" (in the simple case). Breaking that for decorated classes seems like a horrible idea. TC39 is meeting this week. Here's hoping they come to resolution on this stuff and, as is usually the case, a good one that makes sense. -- T.J. Crowder
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
