There's a difference between meeting minutes of the WG and the discussions that need to occur now in the development community. If ES4 is to succeed, a chunk of the development community needs to get behind it (and at least not be actively opposed to it). The insider baseball that's been occurring for the last two years is not particularly useful to the development community (no, I am not going back to read two years worth of minutes). It would be extremely helpful to get a coherent set of the concerns about ES4 (Doug's "consequences") so that interested parties outside of the WG can get a sense of what's going on technically. I would specifically like to hear a realistic technical scenario where the implementation of ES4 produces serious complications in the open web.
-- Yehuda On 10/30/07, Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/30/07, Douglas Crockford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It has serious consequences that should be discussed. > > Well, it looks like there are two years of meeting minutes on the > wiki. Do the details of these consequences appear anywhere in the > minutes? If not, now is the time to get very specific, or get out of > the way. > > -- > > Robert Sayre > > "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time." > _______________________________________________ > Es4-discuss mailing list > Es4-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss > -- Yehuda Katz Web Developer | Procore Technologies (ph) 718.877.1325
_______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list Es4-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss