On Nov 14, 2007 2:03 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nullability: Are non-nullable types really worth it? I am not sure. > Does any other explicit type system for a dynamic OO language have > such a concept? The whitepaper says that "the ability to store null is > occasionally the source of run-time errors" but will not dynamic- > checking result in runtime errors anyway when assigning null to a non- > nullable variable (except in strict mode)?
That was one of the features I most liked. Working in Flex, I have problems with nullable variables all the time. > Map: Long overdue to have a real hashtable type. Yes! Parameterized types in general are probably my favorite addition. (Now if only there were some sort of solution comparable to abstract classes....) -- T. Michael Keesey Director of Technology Exopolis, Inc. 2894 Rowena Avenue Ste. B Los Angeles, California 90039 http://exopolis.com/ -- http://3lbmonkeybrain.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list Es4-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
