StevenLevithan wrote: > > And I've posted a follow-up > http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/es3-regexes-broken here (which in > truth is more of a long rant). >
At the risk of spamming the mailing list, I'll note that I've just toned down a lot of the previous, undue negativity towards the draft ES4 regex spec in that post. I'm not really a hateful ingrate. :) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Regex%3A-How-should-backreferences-contained-in-the-capturing-match-they-reference-to-work--tf4367560.html#a13984745 Sent from the Mozilla - ECMAScript 4 discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list Es4-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
