2008/1/24 Nathan de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 20:04 +0100, Chris Pine wrote: > > > It was agreed that implementations would always be free to implement > > PTC... > > Really? That wasn't the impression I got. My understanding is that if > PTC isn't a requirement, it should not exist. As a programmer, I don't > want to need to keep track of whether which implementations support my > programming style. Do we really want "ES4" and "Stackless ES4" (for > example)?
I believe that is the situation now with ES3 and that an ES3 implementation can use proper tail calls if it wishes to. The string "tail" doesn't even appear in the ES3 spec. [snip] > PS: What's the go with everyone including long lists of CCs? Isn't > everyone here on [EMAIL PROTECTED] For this list, "reply" doesn't default to the list. To post to the list, I think folks just hit "reply all" and don't clean up the list of CCs. Peter _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list Es4-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
