Peter Hall wrote: > > The latter. It is weird, I agree. But the enumerator can easily be > > customized, so I want the default enumerator be as non-magical as > > possible - and therefore, as simple as possible. In fact, I'm a bit > > bothered that propertyIsEnumerable is a method of Object yet can be > > rendered useless when changing the enumerator - along this line of > > reasoning, one would think that such a specific method shouldn't be a > > method of Object at all, but rather the enumerator itself. > > > > So how would you go about enumerating the properties of an arbitrary > dynamic object, whose properties could be in namespaces? >
I thought there was an iterator that would enumerate all properties regardless of enumerability (including those in other namespaces), but apparently not. There should be such an iterator though. > > Yeah, I vaguely remember some discussion concerning multiple namespaces > > per property a long time ago (maybe a year ago). It was rejected > > probably due to complexity. > > Not being able to combine them effectively makes many of the initial > proposal's use-cases useless, because two use-cases may arise > simultaneously when integrating two codebases, and be irreparably > conflicting. > > Peter > What "initial proposal" are you talking about? -Yuh-Ruey _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list Es4-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
