On May 28, 2008, at 10:38 PM, Pratap Lakshman (VJ#SDK) wrote:

I have uploaded to the wiki (link, see bottom of the page) a first draft of the specification for ES3.1. This is in the form of in- place edits and markups to the ES3 specification. As you will notice when reading through, there are still some open issues, and details on a few features to be filled in. This spec shall be updated as we make progress on these.


I have only skimmed the beginning of the document. The following change seems like a technical error:

"All constructors are objects, but not all objects are constructors."
  -->
"All constructors are functions, but not all functions are usefully treated as constructors."

ECMAScript constructors need not be functions; an object may implement the [[Construct]] internal property without also implementing the [[Call]] internal property, thus it would be a constructor but not a function. I assume it was not the intent to deliberately remove this possibility.

Also, the addition of "usefully treated as" does not make sense. An object that does not implement the [[Construct]] internal property is not a constructor at all, rather than merely "not usefully treated as" a constructor.

The definition from the original spec that actually seems wrong is in 4.3.4, "A constructor is a Function object that creates and initialises objects."


With a lot of the changes, I could not tell if the intent was to change language semantics or to make a clarifying editorial change.


Regards,
Maciej

_______________________________________________
Es4-discuss mailing list
Es4-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss

Reply via email to