On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Brendan Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Reformed with" was an attempt to restore lexical scope by exact type
> annotation. That's what people voted down, not the ES1-3 "with" statement.

I'm confused. Aren't we talking about "reformed with"? What other
"with" do people imagine is compatible with strict mode? I must have
missed something.


-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM
_______________________________________________
Es4-discuss mailing list
Es4-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss

Reply via email to