On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Brendan Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Reformed with" was an attempt to restore lexical scope by exact type > annotation. That's what people voted down, not the ES1-3 "with" statement.
I'm confused. Aren't we talking about "reformed with"? What other "with" do people imagine is compatible with strict mode? I must have missed something. -- Cheers, --MarkM _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list Es4-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss