Igor Bukanov wrote:
> I guess that proposal can be summarized in a very short form:
>
> make
>
> {{ code }}
>
> a syntax sugar for
>
> (function() { code })()
Indeed you're right.
When I proposed {{ }} my intent was simplicity, but I didn't
realize that implementing it could be made that simple, the
change that small.
By the way, your translation
(function() { code })()
can also be expressed as
new function() { code }
Less parentheses!
(But I haven't explored possible drawbacks.)
--
Ingvar von Schoultz
------- (My quirky use of capitals in code comes from my opinion that
reserved and predefined words should all start with lowercase, and
user-defined should all start with uppercase, because this will easily
and elegantly prevent a host of name-collision problems when things
like programming languages are upgraded with new labels.)
_______________________________________________
Es4-discuss mailing list
Es4-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
