As I said in a previous email, I'm assuming that a branch would be easiest way for @dpp to get started.
D. On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe<[email protected]> wrote: > David, > > I would say we have all agreed that G2 is the way forward. > How you thought about how we proceed from here? Who does what? > > /Anne > > > On 12. aug.. 2009, at 09.15, Vassil Dichev wrote: > >>> Actually, I think this is an extension to microblogging. >>> >>> If I microblog: >>> >>> tcw: dickh re: #ESME standup time: 30min >>> todo: add different authentication to #ESME >>> working on: #ESME authentication >>> done: #esme authentication >>> >>> over the course of a day, those updates are meaningful to humans, but can >>> also be parsed and used to update structured data. >> >> In fact, the idea is not new. Take a look at twitterdata.org : >> "...simple, open, semi-structured format for embedding >> machine-readable, yet human-friendly, data in Twitter messages...". >> That totally defines what we want to do with actions. >> >> Granted, you won't see as much interest in processing messages on >> Twitter as in a corporate environment, but @rtm, @timer and >> @iwantsandy are still quite popular. >> >> I also don't see this as something that replaces what ESME currently >> is, but as a way to extend ESME. Most likely the change wouldn't even >> be noticeable, like when Google introduced Calculator- there's no >> change in the interface, but if you typed "2+2" or "123 in hex" or >> "sin(pi/4) ^ 2", the result would get evaluated. >> >> Vassil > >
